News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Taking on Telstra 

Taking on Telstra

25 Aug, 2010 09:41 AM
Year 5 student Tom Stephens isn’t a fan of Telstra’s plans to build a 25-metre mobile phone tower next to the car park at Wentworth Falls Country Club — so he is doing something about it.

The Blue Mountains Grammar School student penned a petition opposing the tower, encouraged people in his school to sign it last week and posted copies to the Blue Mountains mayor, local members of parliament and even the NSW Premier.

“I live about half a kilometre from where the tower could be and I’m very concerned about it, so I hope my petition goes well,” Tom said.

“My parents, a general practitioner and a naturopath, are also opposed to the tower on health grounds, but the petition was my idea and I wrote it.”

The petition states, “we, the below signed, don’t want a mobile phone tower built near where kids live or where schools and recreational facilities are because no-one can guarantee they are safe for our health.”

Because the tower’s height prevents it being defined as a low impact facility, Telstra was required to lodge a development application with council.

According to the application report there are some parts of northern Wentworth Falls where Telstra has little, if any, mobile phone coverage and the proposed tower with eight antennas would solve that problem and improve reception.

The report claims “other than residential premises, there are no land uses commonly considered to be community sensitive locations such as schools in the immediate vicinity”.

Wentworth Falls Country Club manager Matt Lark told the Gazette he is aware some residents oppose the proposal and acknowledges the club will benefit financially from it, but “the board investigated it pretty thoroughly after being approached by Telstra and is comfortable with its decision”.

“We were informed the estimated electromagnetic radiation maximum output from the tower is 0.41 per cent of the permissible total considered to be safe under the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency,” Mr Lark said.

“It (the tower) is tall but will be screened by trees.”

Meanwhile, Wentworth Falls resident Patrick Neal said he was alarmed to find a leaflet in his letterbox urging people to contact councillors to oppose the tower on the basis it would cause major health risks.

On the back were references to scientific studies, but only ones that found radiation from mobile phone towers increased the risk of illness or disease.

“The author of this leaflet should at least have the guts to identify themselves and their credentials,” Mr Neal said.

“We need better phone reception, particularly for emergencies like bushfires and people getting lost — that could save lives.”

The development application remains on public exhibition at council until Friday, August 27 and will then be determined by council.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Tom Stephens clever campaign to seek support from petitioners to not permit a radio (micro-wave) transmission tower adjacent to his and neighboring residents raises an interesting situation. During the election campaign the Liberal Party Leader Mr Abbott told Australians the he is opposed to the installation of Ms Gillard's (NBN) optic fiber technology carrying information at the speed of light. Mr. Stephens campaign pin points and highlights the difficulty Mr Abbott may experience, given he becomes PM, installing thousands of additional micro-wave towers in urban Australia, because all these towers combined may surely have a negative impact.
Posted by Ralf, 25/08/2010 8:47:50 PM, on Blue Mountains Gazette
As a bit of information. These sorts of towers are mainly used for mobile phone and other mobile networks, inluding emergency services GRN system and they are also used as booster locations for television and other such networks. NBN is a completely different system altogether mainly aimed at advanced residential and commercial services such as internet services. It is true though that technically, apart from the standard underground cabling network, towers could be used to advance internet speeds in cases whereby there is a direct connection between the tower and the end user. For the end user at residential or commercial premises, and I have checked this with people in Tasmania with the new NBN connection, I think I would prefer NBN. For mobile phone and other mobile uses, there will always be the 'tower-issue' in terms of where to put them as is the case in this instance. A little better research in terms of where they put these things would go a long way.
Posted by Henk Luf, 26/08/2010 1:11:39 PM, on Blue Mountains Gazette

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Taking action: Year 5 student Tom Stephens with a petition he penned that opposes a proposal by Telstra to erect a 25-metre mobile phone tower at Wentworth Falls Country Club.
Taking action: Year 5 student Tom Stephens with a petition he penned that opposes a proposal by Telstra to erect a 25-metre mobile phone tower at Wentworth Falls Country Club.

Most popular articles


BM Gazette Online


Blue Mountains Gazette







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...